When we write academically, it is true that we
intend to persuade our reader. However, successful persuasion is actually the
result of telling the truth about what we have found, from a point of
curiosity. Telling a reader that something is so, or telling the reader what to
do or think, without telling the reader why, is just not very persuasive. As a
reader, you probably recognize the fact that you would resent such a maneuver,
and that you would be much more likely to become engaged if, upon reading what
someone has written, you said to yourself: “That seems reasonable” and “I never
thought about it that way, before.”
At that point, the job of the academic writer is
done. As for compelling someone to action telling the reader what he or she (or
all of us) should think or do, or should not think or do that is not our job.
In writing, we trust readers to think or act according to their own judgment.
Old
Rule:
The purpose of academic writing is to tell the reader what we “should” do.
New
Rule:
The purpose of academic writing is to tell the reader what we have come to
understand.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar